As I start on my journey to set up a new business, I have been focused on whether I can sustain my current lifestyle with this business, and if not, how can I make up the difference? If the gap is too great, do I really want to follow this path?
Those are good economical questions to ask and an important part of my business case. As I read the assigned works this week, and watched the assigned video's, I actually felt guilty for how I have been thinking. I have said that I am happy to earn less, I just need to be able to keep my house. I love my home, I love my view of the temple and the panoramic view of the mountains. I never tire of seeing it and would love to stay here for the rest of my life. It has been my one financial goal: Keep the house.
After listening to "Are we not all beggars" and "Entrepreneurship and Consecration", I have started to think differently. It is just geography - there are many that are homeless and hungry, there are many, even in my community that are financially struggling. How can I be so arrogant that I want to "keep my view" In all honesty, I am not quite ready to give up on my goal yet - but I need to maybe temper it at least a little.
Elder Gay's talk was incredibly powerful, I have been trying to find a written copy of it - but to no avail. At the very least I will download it so that I can continue to listen to it.
In Charles Handy's "What's a business for?" we start to explore the purpose of businesses and the increasing gap between the rich and the poor. Are CEO's becoming focused on self interest? Or are they truly focused on shareholder value. In is imperative that virtue and integrity remain in tact in order to maintain the appropriate balance.
Handy states that businesses don't exist just to make money, but there is always "something" more - something that the busienss contributes instead of just making money. It could be a brand, technology, anything....but something more than just profit.
Handy suggests that increased financial accountability would further protect shareholders and ensure financial security, he also suggested driving accountability below the CFO level, providing increased accountability. This article was written in 2002, which is the year that SOX was implemented, it has evolved significantly since then and I believe these laws have increased corporate accountability significantly.
There was some sad irony to the John Browne perspective of environmental sustainability. BP later caused the worst marine oil spill in history, which signficantly impacted the whole industry. However, this does not impact the intent of driving to sustainability..
The article quotes a gallup poll that states that 90% of the public do not trust the integrity of people running organizations. I think we are measuring the wrong thing. It's easy to paint everyone with the Enron brush, but when you are actually working with business leaders, you know that these are generally honorable people, and we need to be careful not to assume that popular belief reflects reality. The "occupy" movement is based on corporate greed, and while there may be issues, I think some of those issues are more about perception than reality.
Those are good economical questions to ask and an important part of my business case. As I read the assigned works this week, and watched the assigned video's, I actually felt guilty for how I have been thinking. I have said that I am happy to earn less, I just need to be able to keep my house. I love my home, I love my view of the temple and the panoramic view of the mountains. I never tire of seeing it and would love to stay here for the rest of my life. It has been my one financial goal: Keep the house.
After listening to "Are we not all beggars" and "Entrepreneurship and Consecration", I have started to think differently. It is just geography - there are many that are homeless and hungry, there are many, even in my community that are financially struggling. How can I be so arrogant that I want to "keep my view" In all honesty, I am not quite ready to give up on my goal yet - but I need to maybe temper it at least a little.
Elder Gay's talk was incredibly powerful, I have been trying to find a written copy of it - but to no avail. At the very least I will download it so that I can continue to listen to it.
In Charles Handy's "What's a business for?" we start to explore the purpose of businesses and the increasing gap between the rich and the poor. Are CEO's becoming focused on self interest? Or are they truly focused on shareholder value. In is imperative that virtue and integrity remain in tact in order to maintain the appropriate balance.
Handy states that businesses don't exist just to make money, but there is always "something" more - something that the busienss contributes instead of just making money. It could be a brand, technology, anything....but something more than just profit.
Handy suggests that increased financial accountability would further protect shareholders and ensure financial security, he also suggested driving accountability below the CFO level, providing increased accountability. This article was written in 2002, which is the year that SOX was implemented, it has evolved significantly since then and I believe these laws have increased corporate accountability significantly.
There was some sad irony to the John Browne perspective of environmental sustainability. BP later caused the worst marine oil spill in history, which signficantly impacted the whole industry. However, this does not impact the intent of driving to sustainability..
The article quotes a gallup poll that states that 90% of the public do not trust the integrity of people running organizations. I think we are measuring the wrong thing. It's easy to paint everyone with the Enron brush, but when you are actually working with business leaders, you know that these are generally honorable people, and we need to be careful not to assume that popular belief reflects reality. The "occupy" movement is based on corporate greed, and while there may be issues, I think some of those issues are more about perception than reality.